Saturday, December 23, 2006
CA 19-9 Results Down
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Latest Checkup
We had a lot to discuss with Dr. Laheru with respect to the next steps for her treatment plan. Basically we have decided to not complete her Gemzar chemotherapy. Our mother had completed only 1 of the 9 Gemzar infusions before she had some bleeding incidents and her stomach condition deteriorated. She has been very weak and has had problems with her eating and weight for the last year. Instead, we are going to try and start her on the Hopkins vaccine booster trial in January. Dr. Laheru mentioned that new results for the vaccine will be published in January but he wouldn't tell us if the results continue to look promising or not.
It's now been slightly over a year since our mother's operation. She has gone through a lot of suffering and she handled all of this with tremendous strength and a wonderful attitude. Her stomach pain and eating problems continue and don't show any signs of improvement but we hope that things get better next year. I hope she will be able to start enjoying her days a little bit more this next year and that she will be able to travel.
Happy Holidays.
Monday, November 13, 2006
CA 19-9 Results
Friday, November 03, 2006
Eating Issues
Saturday, October 07, 2006
Partial Blockage
We are now aware that she really needs to watch exactly what she eats. One thing that is interesting is that when she eats tuna sushi, she doesn't get a stomach ache. I know that there might be some risks with food poisoning, but the benefits here for her seem to outweigh the risks. So maybe she just needs a lot of sushi :->. Our parents are planning to come out to California so I'm hoping her condition improves over the next weeks.
We've also had some slightly worrisome CA 19-9 results recently. One test came out at 43 (previously at 26) but we retested and it was at 32. So the trend appears to be upwards which is not good. However, Dr. Laheru said it was still within the normal range. There's probably not much that she could tolerate in terms of chemo even if we had a higher number so we may just need to wait it out and retest. We're trying to go over strategy at this point - we may have to decide between completing the rest of the Gemzar treatments or trying to get her on the Hopkins vaccine trial. I need to find more information from Dr. Laheru in order to make this decision. I pray that her condition continues to improve.
Friday, August 11, 2006
Recovering Again
I haven't updated things in a while. I'm very happy that we went to Johns Hopkins. Dr. Hutcheon performed an endoscopy and cauterized several small areas that he said were bleeding. The next day, my mother had a normal looking stool for the first time since the first bleeding incident began back in early June. Whatever Dr. Hutcheon did, was really fantastic. My mother recovered in the hospital for a few days (her HCT was at 21 this time when she was admitted) and was released after a few days. Her HCT was at 34 when she was discharged and continues to hold steady. Dr. Hutcheon also has set up follow up endoscopies to check up on things periodically. I like his proactive approach. My mother though is still suffering from some terrible stomach aches after she eats. This is likely due to the radiation gastritis. She's unable to gain weight and remains at about 100 lbs. We've held off again on the chemotherapy until she has a chance to gain more strength back. Dr. Laheru ordered a CA 19-9 this past Wednesday and the results were similar to her last test so we're glad to hear that (about 26).
Friday, July 21, 2006
Very Concerned - Third Bleeding Incident
Sunday, July 09, 2006
Bleeding Again
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Second Phase Chemotherapy
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Johns Hopkins Checkup
The checkup with Dr. Laheru at Hopkins went very well. He said my mother's scans were clear and that the previous CT was probably an "overcall". He said the liver area looked just fine. We were all very happy to hear that. He recommended three rounds of Gemcitabine. Each round consists of three weekly infusions of Gemcitabine followed by a checkup with Dr. Laheru. Dr. Picozzi had recommended Gemcitabine plus Taxotere. I think this is probably based on the GTX protocol that seems to have good success with advanced pancreatic cancer, although he is not using the X part of the protocol (Xeloda). Dr. Laheru mentioned that this would be significantly tougher and that he recommended Gemcitabine alone. Given our mom's condition, I think everybody agreed that it was best not to put her through something too difficult. We begin next week - on Monday my mother will get a subcutaneous port and her treatment begins on Thursday. Under this schedule she will be done by mid September. Dr. Laheru also mentioned that there's still a good chance that the Hopkins vaccine booster trial will begin sometime this year and that we can try that after the chemotherapy is done.
It was also very nice to meet our friend face to face at Hopkins who has followed a similar battle over the last 6 months. She's been doing a very similar treatment plan as our mother so we have been comparing notes via email. We couldn't believe how great she looked even after having been through so much.
Friday, June 02, 2006
Bleeding Scare
Saturday, May 13, 2006
CA 19-9 Results
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Troubling News
- Mom had blood drawn for her CA 19-9 this morning and then had her CT scan. Then we saw Dr. Picozzi this afternoon. I picked up 2 CD copies of Mom's VMP scans (both the Jan and the current one) and also have copies of the CT reports. I will give these to Dad along with Mom's other records so that he can bring them to Virginia. I think we should give Dr. Laheru a copy of the CT CD on the May 10 visit so Hopkins can look at it as well. Maybe Laheru will also want to do another CT scan.
- The CA 19-9 tumor marker test results will not be in until next week on Monday. Recall that Mom's CA 19-9 pre-surgery was in the 800s I think. In Dec., the Hopkins CA 19-9 showed a value of 15.9 I believe. In Jan., the VMP CA 19-9 showed a value of 7. Note that the tests have an amount of variation - i.e. 2 tests on the same day could show some variation (I didn't ask how much). So we shouldn't be too alarmed if it is higher than before but we should hope I think that it is below the normal range of 37 I think. Anyways, when we get the results from Picozzi we should ask him how to interpret it and what course of action to take.
- Mom's Chest X-Ray was normal. CT scan though revealed an area on the liver that he said is "less homogenous" with no defined boundary. This area was there on the Dec. Hopkins and Jan. VMP scans but has grown in size. It could be "suspicious" for metastatic disease. He said that he discussed this with the radiologist and that their opinion is that if the tumor marker CA 19-9 tests are still in the normal range, then we can just continue to follow the area via periodic CT scans. If the marker is not in the normal range then he would recommend having the area biopsied. This would not be good news. I've put the radiologist report at the end of this email.
- Mom's potassium level was somewhat low. Also her white count was still a little low (about the same as when she left). He said it was not dangerously low but that we may need to think about using Neupogen (sp?) during the next chemotherapy rounds.
- I asked how often that Mom should do follow up marker bloodwork and CT scans. Dr. Picozzi recommended that we do the blood marker CA 19-9 about once a month. We should do a CT at least when her next course of treatment is done and maybe one in the middle. Her next course of treatment is about 3-4 months long.
- I asked if we need to transfer records to Hopkins. Dr. Picozzi said that he will be writing and sending a letter to Dr. Laheru directly that will summarize Mom's condition and his recommendations. Dr. Picozzi did not think that Dr. Laheru needs any other medical records. So if we can give to Dr. Laheru the CD with the CT scans and maybe make sure he verbally knows about the results of the CA 19-9 tests, I believe that will be adequate.
- Dr. Picozzi thinks that Mom should start her next course of treatment by the middle of May. She should be strong enough to begin at that point. He recommended that we choose between the following 2 protocols. a) 5FU via continuous infusion pump with 2 6-week courses separated by a 2 week break in between. (this is the same drug mom got from the pump in the first phase) b) Gemcitabine + Taxotere given by IV for a few hours once every 2 weeks with a total of 8 treatments over 16 weeks. Dr. Picozzi mentioned that Mom's white blood cell count should be stimulated by giving Neupogene (sp?). He couldn't clearly recommend one over the other. The advantages of the 5FU are that it is "easier" and proven since this is what was used in the original VMP results that have been documented. The advantages of the GemTax is that it seems more promising in that it has been shown to be more effective in advanced pancreatic cancer for metastatic disease. Whether it is better in the adjuvant therapy case is not yet known. However, it is "harder" than the 5FU and has more side effects like nausea and hair loss. If Mom's first phase of the VMP was a 10 in difficulty, then the 5FU is rated as a 2 by him and the GemTax a 4.5.
- Mom should increase her Protonix to 2x a day since she is feeling indigestion. A part of the discomfort might be caused by scarring due to the scar and radiation. Mom was also prescribed Potassium supplements which she is to take until she sees Dr. Laheru and then it can be reassessed.
RADIOLOGIST REPORT
CT of the abdomen without and with IV contrast, pancreas protocol, May 2, 2006. The patient received 125 cc of Isovue-370 has IV contrast. Compared with the prior study dated January 5, 2006.
Findings:
There is an ill-defined low attenuation lesion in the left lobe of liver near the biliary anastomosis. This measures 2.4 x 2.1 cm, image 75 series 4. Previously it measured 2 cm x 1.8 cm. On an earlier study dated December 28, 2005 from Johns Hopkins this lesion measured approximately 2 cm x 1.1 cm.
There is a comma shaped fluid density lesion in the liver which measures 3.2 x 1.1 cm, image 79. This has increased in size significantly compared to the earlier studies. This has the appearance of a dilated duct or perhaps a pseudocyst.
There is diffuse decrease in attenuation in the medial aspect of the liver. There is increasing soft tissue in the periportal region with loss of the fat in this region.
No masses identified within the residual pancreas. There is no dilation of the pancreatic duct.
The portal vein splenic vein and SMV are patent.
No adenopathy is appreciated.
Impression:
Increasing size of irregular low density lesion in the left lobe of the liver suspect for increasing metastatic disease. Increasing ill-defined soft tissue in the periportal region and diffuse decreased density in the medial aspect of the liver. It is unclear this is due to sequela of radiation therapy or progression metastatic disease and clinical correlation is necessary.
Comma shaped fluid density lesion in the liver which is increased in size and may be an isolated bile duct or pseudocyst.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Recovery
It's been about 4 weeks since our mother finished the first phase of the VMP at Virginia Mason. She's looking a lot better but still not quite back to where she was prior to beginning the treatment. Mainly she suffers from indigestion - she's scared to eat too much because she feels like her stomach gets hard and stuck. So she hasn't gained too much weight back. Her hair also has continued to thin. It's almost time to go back to see Dr. Picozzi to restage. We're praying that everything is OK. After the checkup, our mother and father are going to go back to Virginia and continue her treatments with Dr. Laheru at Johns Hopkins.
Saturday, April 01, 2006
Finished VMP Phase I
The last week of the VMP was pretty difficult although I think my mother was in a little better condition than when we began the break (she was suffering a lot at that point). She suffered with nausea and was barely able to eat much. At least the sores on her lips didn't recur. After the last week of chemo, her white blood cell count was low again so Dr. Picozzi cut out the last three days of her chemo and she only had radiation for those last three days. Mom's last day of radiation was Friday, March 24. The radiation team was so nice - they gave her a certificate of completion and we rang a bell to signify she was done with that round.
She also developed a low grade fever during the last days of her treatment. We were a bit worried because having an infection when your white blood cell count is low can be extremely dangerous. So we took her temperature very frequently and it generally varied between 99.5 and 100.5. It reached 100.8 at one point. The VM team's "when to call" sheet stated only to call when fever reached 101 so we never called in off hours. We saw Dr. Picozzi on Monday and he decided to run a battery of tests to check for infection just in case (since we were planning to leave Seattle on Wednesday). All the tests were fine and he gave us permission to leave! We will return to Seattle at the beginning of May for a CT and restaging and to plan the next phases. Dr. Picozzi said the next phases are "much easier" than what she went through. I really hope that is true because I don't think my mother can go through that again.
It has now been a little over a week since her treatment finished and I would say that today is the first day I think my mother feels somewhat OK. She's still been suffering from nausea and indigestion but everyday seems just a little better. I hope the trend continues and that she can make a full recovery as soon as possible.
Thursday, March 16, 2006
Restarting VMP
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
VMP Break
We just saw Dr. Picozzi this morning and the weekly blood tests showed that Mom's white blood cell count is too low. So she's going to take a week break off of everything. Apparently, this is more common than not - 2/3 of patients going through the VMP require a break. So we're not too concerned about it diluting the effects of the treatment. In addition, she will have reduced strengths of the drugs when she starts again next week. Once we start, there will only be 10 days. I also asked Dr. Picozzi about the next steps. He said Mom would rest about 4 weeks or so after phase I and that she would return for tests to restage the tumor. After that we would discuss the next phases where several options would likely be offered. I think it will be a good break for our mother since she's been suffering quite a bit these past few days.
Third and Fourth Week on VMP
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Second Week on VMP
Sunday, February 12, 2006
First Week on VMP
Monday, January 16, 2006
Decision
Friday, January 13, 2006
Consultation with Dr. Laheru
We also talked a lot about the GVAX vaccine. Apparently, they are planning a booster study that they are going to open sometime later this year. He said that my mother would be eligible to receive the vaccine under this study although this would happen after she finishes her chemotherapy. I asked if there were any ways to offer it sooner and he said unfortunately there was no way that would be possible. I really hope that this study gets launched and that the criteria are such that many people can benefit from it.
He mentioned that Hopkins might be able to offer the VMP but it seems like it might be a better idea to do the first part of the protocol at Virginia Mason since they are so experienced with it. We could do the latter part at Johns Hopkins. He wouldn't recommend using Avastin as that is too toxic.
My mother really liked Dr. Laheru and mentioned afterwards a few times that we should use Johns Hopkins. As I mentioned, the last one always seems to be winning. Dr. Laheru stressed that treatment should begin soon (we are at 6.5 weeks post whipple). We now have to make the big decision this weekend.
Dr. Cameron sent us a very thoughtful thank you note for the scarf today.
Monday, January 09, 2006
Consultation with Dr. Picozzi
We finally had our chance to talk to Dr. Picozzi. He started off by asking us about our backgrounds (schools, jobs, etc.). He seemed really interested in this and I'm not sure if it was because he wanted to make us feel comfortable (people like talking about themselves) or because he liked to get to know his patients. My father, sister and Dr. Picozzi had all gone to Yale and he seemed very pleased with that.
Dr. Picozzi mentioned several things of interest:
- Without adjuvant treatment, the cancer recurs locally 30-60% of the time and recurs systemically 80% of the time.
- It's better to treat systemically sooner rather than later (VMP does both at early stage).
- The standard chemotherapy vs. standard chemoradiotherapy give about the same survival rates.
- He's wary about Xeloda as opposed to using 5FU since there have been no tests to confirm that it is as effective.
- VMP gives long term survival of 40-50%.
- Results at Virginia Mason may be slightly better than those in the initial publication.
- He's made the VMP less toxic recently and believes that the side effects are no worse than standard treatment if you do the VMP at Virginia Mason with their supportive care.
- Only one person dropped out and there have been no deaths.
- Average age of patients treated under VMP is 64.
This is the serene and comfortable waiting room at Virginia Mason.
Doctor Picozzi also mentioned something interesting about my Mom's condition we hadn't heard before. He said that her CA 19-9 pre-surgery was very high - 801.7 and that some institutions would not even operate with such a high number. This might indicate that the chances of some "occult cancer" being around is higher. However, he said that her current CA 19-9 level of 15.7 was a good sign that maybe all the cancer was removed. He also mentioned he had floated the idea of starting a trial with Laheru where they would layer the GVAX vaccine on top of the VMP protocol. I think that would be a fantastic idea.
We were pretty happy with the visit. Dr. Picozzi seemed very knowledgable and very kind. We seem to like the Doctor best that we have seen most recently for some reason :->. If it's true that doing the VMP now is not much more difficult than standard chemoradiation, then it seems like a great approach. My mother definitely needed to hear from Picozzi that the protocol was not too toxic for her and that it was not much more difficult than the standard treatment. We spent the rest of the day looking for a place to stay should we decide to come to Virginia Mason for treatment.